STATE BANK OF INDIA vs JAYESHBHAI BALDEVBHAI GOKLANI — 61/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 11th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAH090007742022
Filing Number
61/2022
Filing Date
24-02-2022
Registration No
61/2022
Registration Date
24-02-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
2-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BANK OF INDIA
Adv. R A SHAH
Respondent(s)
JAYESHBHAI BALDEVBHAI GOKLANI
NIMISHA JAYESHBHAI GOKLANI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 28-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 12-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 30-12-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed Regular Civil Suit No. 61 of 2022 for default under Order 9 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 8,52,378/- was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to prosecute the case for approximately 15 months despite multiple hearings, did not attempt service of summons on the defendant after they vacated the premises, and failed to comply with the court's cost order of Rs. 300/-. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed Regular Civil Suit No. 61 of 2022 for default under Order 9 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 8,52,378/- was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to prosecute the case for approximately 15 months despite multiple hearings, did not attempt service of summons on the defendant after they vacated the premises, and failed to comply with the court's cost order of Rs. 300/-. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts