STATE BANK OF INDIA, CHANGODAR BRANCH vs JAYESHBHAI BALDEVBHAI GOKALANI — 62/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 11th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAH090007442022
Filing Number
62/2022
Filing Date
23-02-2022
Registration No
62/2022
Registration Date
23-02-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
2-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BANK OF INDIA, CHANGODAR BRANCH
Adv. R.A. SHAH
Respondent(s)
JAYESHBHAI BALDEVBHAI GOKALANI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 28-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 12-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 30-12-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed Regular Civil Suit No. 62 of 2022 for default under Order 9 Rule 3 of the CPC. The bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 3,69,953/- was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to prosecute the case for approximately 15 months, missed multiple hearing dates, did not comply with cost orders, and showed no interest in proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed Regular Civil Suit No. 62 of 2022 for default under Order 9 Rule 3 of the CPC. The bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 3,69,953/- was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to prosecute the case for approximately 15 months, missed multiple hearing dates, did not comply with cost orders, and showed no interest in proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts