DHOBI NILESHKUMAR MAFATBHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 70/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJAH090004112026

Case disposed

Filing Number

70/2026

Filing Date

04-02-2026

Registration No

70/2026

Registration Date

04-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192050250796

Police Station

SANAND POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AE,116B,98(2),81

Petitioner(s)

DHOBI NILESHKUMAR MAFATBHAI

Adv. M H SENVA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

18-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

11-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

07-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

28-02-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
ORDER

The court conditionally allowed the applicant's application for interim custody of a seized Maruti Swift car under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai that seized property should not deteriorate in police custody. The vehicle was released to the registered owner upon executing a bond for 1.5 times its value, with strict conditions including an undertaking not to transfer possession, not use it illegally, and maintaining proper documentation through photographs and panchnama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court conditionally allowed the applicant's application for interim custody of a seized Maruti Swift car under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai that seized property should not deteriorate in police custody. The vehicle was released to the registered owner upon executing a bond for 1.5 times its value, with strict conditions including an undertaking not to transfer possession, not use it illegally, and maintaining proper documentation through photographs and panchnama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case