THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MANSUKH URFE MAYUR PRAVINBHAI NAYAK — 182/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090002962026
Filing Number
182/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
182/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192050250721
Police Station
SANAND POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MANSUKH URFE MAYUR PRAVINBHAI NAYAK
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 09-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 30-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In Criminal Case No. 182/2026, the Ahmedabad Sessions Court acquitted the accused Mansu Uffed Mayur Pravinbhai Naik of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to produce independent corroborating evidence against the accused, and the court found the witness testimonies unreliable. The accused was granted benefit of doubt and discharged under CrPC Section 353(6), as the case could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Criminal Case No. 182/2026, the Ahmedabad Sessions Court acquitted the accused Mansu Uffed Mayur Pravinbhai Naik of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to produce independent corroborating evidence against the accused, and the court found the witness testimonies unreliable. The accused was granted benefit of doubt and discharged under CrPC Section 353(6), as the case could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts