THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MANJIBEN KISHORBHAI CHUNARA — 172/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH090002762026

Case disposed

Filing Number

172/2026

Filing Date

27-01-2026

Registration No

172/2026

Registration Date

27-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192015251397

Police Station

CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MANJIBEN KISHORBHAI CHUNARA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

18-04-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

15-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

30-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary In Criminal Case No. 172/2026, the court acquitted the accused (Manjiben Kishoribai Chunara) under IPC Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the only evidence comprised two witnesses whose testimonies were not corroborated by independent evidence, and the accused remained absent throughout the trial. Applying CrPC Section 299, the court found no reliable record of evidence to convict the accused in absentia. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Criminal Case No. 172/2026, the court acquitted the accused (Manjiben Kishoribai Chunara) under IPC Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the only evidence comprised two witnesses whose testimonies were not corroborated by independent evidence, and the accused remained absent throughout the trial. Applying CrPC Section 299, the court found no reliable record of evidence to convict the accused in absentia. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case