THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs GULASHANBHAI GABBARBHAI CHUNARA — 171/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090002752026
Filing Number
171/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
171/2026
Registration Date
27-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251440
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.GULASHANBHAI GABBARBHAI CHUNARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: C.C. No. 171/2026 The court acquitted the accused (Gulshanbai Gabbrbai Chunara) of charges under IPC Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to produce independent corroborating witnesses, and the testimonies of two panchas (village officials) could not support the charges without cross-examination, as the accused remained absent throughout the trial under CrPC Section 299. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 171/2026
Case Summary: C.C. No. 171/2026 The court acquitted the accused (Gulshanbai Gabbrbai Chunara) of charges under IPC Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to produce independent corroborating witnesses, and the testimonies of two panchas (village officials) could not support the charges without cross-examination, as the accused remained absent throughout the trial under CrPC Section 299. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts