THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs TEJALBEN SAGARBHAI RAJESHBHAI CHUNARA — 169/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090002732026
Filing Number
169/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
169/2026
Registration Date
27-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251447
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.TEJALBEN SAGARBHAI RAJESHBHAI CHUNARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary Case: C.C. No. 169/2026 | Date: 30/03/2025 | Court: Sanad, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) The court acquitted the accused Tejalbhen Saurabhh Chunara of charges under IPC Section 54(a)(a) (a bailable offense) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, relying only on unsubstantiated witness testimonies without independent corroboration. Notably, the accused remained absent throughout proceedings under CrPC Section 299 (trial in absentia), and no credible documentary or forensic evidence was produced to prove the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 169/2026
Case Summary Case: C.C. No. 169/2026 | Date: 30/03/2025 | Court: Sanad, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) The court acquitted the accused Tejalbhen Saurabhh Chunara of charges under IPC Section 54(a)(a) (a bailable offense) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, relying only on unsubstantiated witness testimonies without independent corroboration. Notably, the accused remained absent throughout proceedings under CrPC Section 299 (trial in absentia), and no credible documentary or forensic evidence was produced to prove the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts