THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MADHIBEN SHAMBHUBHAI CHUNARA — 162/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090002442026
Filing Number
162/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
162/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251325
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MADHIBEN SHAMBHUBHAI CHUNARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 162/2026 The court acquitted the accused (Madhiben Shambubhai Chunara) of charges under IPC Section 45(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to provide independent corroborating evidence, and the court noted that no separate witnesses supported the case during the accused's absence (trial proceeded under CrPC Section 299). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 162/2026
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 162/2026 The court acquitted the accused (Madhiben Shambubhai Chunara) of charges under IPC Section 45(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to provide independent corroborating evidence, and the court noted that no separate witnesses supported the case during the accused's absence (trial proceeded under CrPC Section 299). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts