THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MANISHABEN RAJUBHAI CHUNARA — 160/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090002422026
Filing Number
160/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
160/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251330
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANISHABEN RAJUBHAI CHUNARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary In Criminal Case No. 160/2026 from Sanad, Amdavad (Gujarat), the court acquitted the accused Manishaben Rajubhai Chunara of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that while the prosecution's case failed in the absence of credible independent witness testimony and proper documentary evidence, no special reasons under CrPC Section 313 existed to support conviction. The court emphasized the fundamental criminal law principle that the burden of proof rests entirely on the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 160/2026
Summary In Criminal Case No. 160/2026 from Sanad, Amdavad (Gujarat), the court acquitted the accused Manishaben Rajubhai Chunara of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that while the prosecution's case failed in the absence of credible independent witness testimony and proper documentary evidence, no special reasons under CrPC Section 313 existed to support conviction. The court emphasized the fundamental criminal law principle that the burden of proof rests entirely on the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts