THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHOKBHAI KALABHAI CHUNARA — 158/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090002402026
Filing Number
158/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
158/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251318
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ASHOKBHAI KALABHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 158/2026, Sanad Court (Ahmedabad District), Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Ashokbhai Kanabhai Chunara) of the charges under IPC Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent witnesses were examined and the accused remained absent during trial. The court found that the evidence on record was insufficient to establish guilt, particularly noting that no proper laboratory testing report was produced to support the prosecution's allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 158/2026, Sanad Court (Ahmedabad District), Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Ashokbhai Kanabhai Chunara) of the charges under IPC Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent witnesses were examined and the accused remained absent during trial. The court found that the evidence on record was insufficient to establish guilt, particularly noting that no proper laboratory testing report was produced to support the prosecution's allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts