THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHOKBHAI RATILAL CHUNARA — 151/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090002332026
Filing Number
151/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
151/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251192
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHOKBHAI RATILAL CHUNARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the accused (Ashoklal Chunara) in Criminal Case No. 151/2026 under IPC Section 65(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that the prosecution failed to provide credible independent witness testimony—the two panchayat witnesses who testified could not properly support the evidence due to procedural defects, and the accused's cross-examination was not conducted as required under CrPC Section 299 (trial in absence of absconded accused). Consequently, the charges were not substantiated, and the accused was acquitted and discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 151/2026
Summary The court acquitted the accused (Ashoklal Chunara) in Criminal Case No. 151/2026 under IPC Section 65(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that the prosecution failed to provide credible independent witness testimony—the two panchayat witnesses who testified could not properly support the evidence due to procedural defects, and the accused's cross-examination was not conducted as required under CrPC Section 299 (trial in absence of absconded accused). Consequently, the charges were not substantiated, and the accused was acquitted and discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts