THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KUVARBEN DEVUBHAI CHUNARA — 139/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090002212026
Filing Number
139/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
139/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251351
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KUVARBEN DEVUBHAI CHUNARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Kunvarben Devubhai Chunara, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the panchas (witnesses) did not support the prosecution's allegations that liquor was recovered from the accused's possession, and the investigation procedure was severely compromised, rendering the evidence unreliable and insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 139/2026
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Kunvarben Devubhai Chunara, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the panchas (witnesses) did not support the prosecution's allegations that liquor was recovered from the accused's possession, and the investigation procedure was severely compromised, rendering the evidence unreliable and insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts