THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KIRANBHAI HEMADBHAI CHUNARA — 130/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090002092026
Filing Number
130/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
130/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251157
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KIRANBHAI HEMADBHAI CHUNARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 130/2026 (Sarand, Amdavad District) Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Kiranbaai Hembaai Chunara, of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a) (theft). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent witness evidence was produced against the accused. Despite recording testimonies under CrPC Section 299 (in the accused's absence due to absconding), the court determined insufficient evidence to establish guilt, hence acquitting the accused under CrPC Section 353(6). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 130/2026
Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 130/2026 (Sarand, Amdavad District) Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Kiranbaai Hembaai Chunara, of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a) (theft). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent witness evidence was produced against the accused. Despite recording testimonies under CrPC Section 299 (in the accused's absence due to absconding), the court determined insufficient evidence to establish guilt, hence acquitting the accused under CrPC Section 353(6). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts