THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KIRANBHAI HEMADBHAI CHUNARA — 130/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH090002092026

Case disposed

Filing Number

130/2026

Filing Date

20-01-2026

Registration No

130/2026

Registration Date

20-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192015251157

Police Station

CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KIRANBHAI HEMADBHAI CHUNARA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

30-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

11-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

23-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 130/2026 (Sarand, Amdavad District) Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Kiranbaai Hembaai Chunara, of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a) (theft). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent witness evidence was produced against the accused. Despite recording testimonies under CrPC Section 299 (in the accused's absence due to absconding), the court determined insufficient evidence to establish guilt, hence acquitting the accused under CrPC Section 353(6). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 130/2026 (Sarand, Amdavad District) Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Kiranbaai Hembaai Chunara, of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a) (theft). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent witness evidence was produced against the accused. Despite recording testimonies under CrPC Section 299 (in the accused's absence due to absconding), the court determined insufficient evidence to establish guilt, hence acquitting the accused under CrPC Section 353(6). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case