THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ANITABEN PRAKASHBHAI CHUNARA — 125/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH090002042026

Case disposed

Filing Number

125/2026

Filing Date

20-01-2026

Registration No

125/2026

Registration Date

20-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192015251222

Police Station

CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

ANITABEN PRAKASHBHAI CHUNARA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

18-04-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

15-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

30-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The court in Criminal Case No. 125/2026 acquitted the accused Anitaben Prakashbhai Chunara under IPC Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent witness corroboration was provided and the accused remained absent throughout the trial, preventing cross-examination. The court applied CrPC Section 299 principles and determined the evidence on record was insufficient to convict. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court in Criminal Case No. 125/2026 acquitted the accused Anitaben Prakashbhai Chunara under IPC Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent witness corroboration was provided and the accused remained absent throughout the trial, preventing cross-examination. The court applied CrPC Section 299 principles and determined the evidence on record was insufficient to convict. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case