THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KALIBEN ASHOKBHAI CHUNARA — 122/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090002012026
Filing Number
122/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
122/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251172
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KALIBEN ASHOKBHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 09-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 30-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In Criminal Case No. 122/2026, the court acquitted the accused (Kalanibem Asokelai Chandra) of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case convincingly, and no independent witness evidence was produced against the accused. Applying CrPC Section 299, which permits trial in the accused's absence when they abscond, the court found the prosecution's evidence inadequate to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Criminal Case No. 122/2026, the court acquitted the accused (Kalanibem Asokelai Chandra) of charges under IPC Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case convincingly, and no independent witness evidence was produced against the accused. Applying CrPC Section 299, which permits trial in the accused's absence when they abscond, the court found the prosecution's evidence inadequate to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts