THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AASHABEN MAHESHBHAI CHUNARA — 120/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090001982026
Filing Number
120/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
120/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251185
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AASHABEN MAHESHBHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In Criminal Case No. 120/2026, the court acquitted the accused Aashaben Maheshbhai Chunara under Section 65(a)(a) of the IPC due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent corroborating evidence was produced against the accused, and the accused's absence during trial (invoking CrPC Section 299) prevented proper cross-examination of prosecution witnesses. Consequently, the first issue was decided in the negative (acquittal), and the accused was discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Criminal Case No. 120/2026, the court acquitted the accused Aashaben Maheshbhai Chunara under Section 65(a)(a) of the IPC due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent corroborating evidence was produced against the accused, and the accused's absence during trial (invoking CrPC Section 299) prevented proper cross-examination of prosecution witnesses. Consequently, the first issue was decided in the negative (acquittal), and the accused was discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts