THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs TEJALBEN SAGARBHAI CHUNARA — 118/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090001962026
Filing Number
118/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
118/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251207
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
TEJALBEN SAGARBHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 118/2026 The court acquitted the accused (Tejliben Sagurabai Chunara) of charges under IPC Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the only evidence was witness testimony that was not properly corroborated by independent or documentary evidence. The court noted procedural defects, including lack of proper cross-examination under CrPC Section 299 (trial in accused's absence) and absence of certified testing reports, making conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 118/2026 The court acquitted the accused (Tejliben Sagurabai Chunara) of charges under IPC Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the only evidence was witness testimony that was not properly corroborated by independent or documentary evidence. The court noted procedural defects, including lack of proper cross-examination under CrPC Section 299 (trial in accused's absence) and absence of certified testing reports, making conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts