THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs TEJALBEN SAGARBHAI CHUNARA — 118/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090001962026
Filing Number
118/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
118/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251207
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.TEJALBEN SAGARBHAI CHUNARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 118/2026 The court acquitted the accused (Tejliben Sagurabai Chunara) of charges under IPC Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the only evidence was witness testimony that was not properly corroborated by independent or documentary evidence. The court noted procedural defects, including lack of proper cross-examination under CrPC Section 299 (trial in accused's absence) and absence of certified testing reports, making conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 118/2026
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 118/2026 The court acquitted the accused (Tejliben Sagurabai Chunara) of charges under IPC Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the only evidence was witness testimony that was not properly corroborated by independent or documentary evidence. The court noted procedural defects, including lack of proper cross-examination under CrPC Section 299 (trial in accused's absence) and absence of certified testing reports, making conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts