THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PANKAJBHAI URFE TILO ISHWARBHAI THAKOR — 116/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090001942026
Filing Number
116/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
116/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251169
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PANKAJBHAI URFE TILO ISHWARBHAI THAKOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Judgment Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 116/2026 | Court: Magistrate Court, Sanad, Amdavad (Gujarat) Decision: The court acquitted the accused Panchbhai Ishverbhai Thakor of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the panchas (witnesses) did not support the prosecution's version and critical gaps existed in the investigation procedure and evidence chain. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 116/2026
Court Judgment Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 116/2026 | Court: Magistrate Court, Sanad, Amdavad (Gujarat) Decision: The court acquitted the accused Panchbhai Ishverbhai Thakor of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the panchas (witnesses) did not support the prosecution's version and critical gaps existed in the investigation procedure and evidence chain. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts