THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RATANBEN MAHESHBHAI CHUNARA — 114/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH090001922026

Filing Number

114/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

114/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192015251346

Police Station

CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RATANBEN MAHESHBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court acquitted the accused, Ratanben Maheshbhai Chunara, of charges under IPC Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to provide independent corroborating testimony or substantive proof beyond witness statements, and the accused's absence during trial (invoking CrPC Section 299) prevented cross-examination, which undermined the case's credibility and the court's confidence in convicting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 114/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused, Ratanben Maheshbhai Chunara, of charges under IPC Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to provide independent corroborating testimony or substantive proof beyond witness statements, and the accused's absence during trial (invoking CrPC Section 299) prevented cross-examination, which undermined the case's credibility and the court's confidence in convicting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case