THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAHULBHAI BALAVANTBHAI CHUNARA — 112/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090001902026
Filing Number
112/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251204
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAHULBHAI BALAVANTBHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Rahul Banavtlai Chunara in Criminal Case No. 112/2026 under IPC Section 65(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court emphasized that despite examining prosecution witnesses, no independent corroborating evidence was presented, and the accused's absence during trial (under CrPC Section 299) prevented proper cross-examination, making conviction unjustifiable under fundamental criminal law principles requiring proof beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused Rahul Banavtlai Chunara in Criminal Case No. 112/2026 under IPC Section 65(a)(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court emphasized that despite examining prosecution witnesses, no independent corroborating evidence was presented, and the accused's absence during trial (under CrPC Section 299) prevented proper cross-examination, making conviction unjustifiable under fundamental criminal law principles requiring proof beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts