THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs GULABBEN DILIPBHAI CHUNARA — 110/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090001882026
Filing Number
110/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
110/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251326
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.GULABBEN DILIPBHAI CHUNARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: C.C. No. 110/2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Gulabben Dilipbhai Chunara, of charges under IPC Section 45(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent witness testimony supported the allegations, and the accused remained absent throughout proceedings under CrPC Section 299. Key Reasoning: The court found that while two panchayat witnesses testified, their evidence lacked corroboration and failed to establish the accused's guilt conclusively. The absence of the accused during trial prevented proper cross-examination of witnesses, making conviction legally unsafe under criminal procedure principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 110/2026
Case Summary: C.C. No. 110/2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Gulabben Dilipbhai Chunara, of charges under IPC Section 45(a)(a) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as no independent witness testimony supported the allegations, and the accused remained absent throughout proceedings under CrPC Section 299. Key Reasoning: The court found that while two panchayat witnesses testified, their evidence lacked corroboration and failed to establish the accused's guilt conclusively. The absence of the accused during trial prevented proper cross-examination of witnesses, making conviction legally unsafe under criminal procedure principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts