THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DAHIBEN BABUBHAI CHUNARA — 103/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH090001812026

Case disposed

Filing Number

103/2026

Filing Date

20-01-2026

Registration No

103/2026

Registration Date

20-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192015251206

Police Station

CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

DAHIBEN BABUBHAI CHUNARA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

18-04-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

15-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

30-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Court Decision (C.C. No. 103/2026) The court acquitted accused Dahiben Babuhai Chunara under Section 65(a)(a) of the IPC, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged crime beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution's case relied solely on two witnesses whose testimony was unsubstantiated by independent evidence, and the accused remained absent throughout proceedings under CrPC Section 299, preventing cross-examination. The court held that the burden of proof on the prosecution was not satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision (C.C. No. 103/2026) The court acquitted accused Dahiben Babuhai Chunara under Section 65(a)(a) of the IPC, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged crime beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution's case relied solely on two witnesses whose testimony was unsubstantiated by independent evidence, and the accused remained absent throughout proceedings under CrPC Section 299, preventing cross-examination. The court held that the burden of proof on the prosecution was not satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case