THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NITABEN BHAILALBHAI HIRABHAI CHUNARA — 99/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090001772026
Filing Number
99/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
99/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251307
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.NITABEN BHAILALBHAI HIRABHAI CHUNARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Court Decision (C.C.NO. 99/2026) The court acquitted the accused Nitaben Bhaiyalal Chuhara of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for alleged illegal possession of liquor, finding the prosecution case fatally flawed. The court held that the panchas (witnesses) failed to corroborate the prosecution's claims and that investigative procedures appeared tainted, rendering the evidence unreliable and the conviction legally unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 99/2026
Summary of Court Decision (C.C.NO. 99/2026) The court acquitted the accused Nitaben Bhaiyalal Chuhara of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for alleged illegal possession of liquor, finding the prosecution case fatally flawed. The court held that the panchas (witnesses) failed to corroborate the prosecution's claims and that investigative procedures appeared tainted, rendering the evidence unreliable and the conviction legally unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts