THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LAXMIBEN RAJESHBHAI CHUNARA — 97/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH090001752026
Filing Number
97/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
97/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192015251365
Police Station
CHANGDODAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
LAXMIBEN RAJESHBHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 09-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 30-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In Criminal Case No. 97/2026, the Sanad District Court acquitted the accused, Lakshminiben Rajeshbhai Chunara, of charges under IPC Section 52(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to establish a convincing case against her. The court noted that while prosecution witnesses testified, no independent corroborating evidence was presented, and the accused remained absent during trial proceedings, preventing proper cross-examination. Applying CrPC Section 299, the court ruled that insufficient evidence existed to hold the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt, thereby ordering her acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Criminal Case No. 97/2026, the Sanad District Court acquitted the accused, Lakshminiben Rajeshbhai Chunara, of charges under IPC Section 52(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to establish a convincing case against her. The court noted that while prosecution witnesses testified, no independent corroborating evidence was presented, and the accused remained absent during trial proceedings, preventing proper cross-examination. Applying CrPC Section 299, the court ruled that insufficient evidence existed to hold the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt, thereby ordering her acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts