Devdatsinh Phulsinh Vaghela vs Chehubhai Trikambhai — 5/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 36. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAH090000232024
Next Hearing
08th July 2026
Filing Number
5/2024
Filing Date
03-01-2024
Registration No
5/2024
Registration Date
03-01-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, SANAND
Judge
1-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Devdatsinh Phulsinh Vaghela
Adv. A M VAVECHA
Respondent(s)
Chehubhai Trikambhai
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM
ISSUES
ISSUES
ISSUES
ISSUES
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | ISSUES |
| 13-04-2026 | ISSUES |
| 11-03-2026 | ISSUES |
| 02-02-2026 | ISSUES |
| 05-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Order Granted: Temporary (interim) injunction allowed till final disposal of the suit. The Additional Senior Civil Judge, Sanand Court, granted the plaintiff's application for interim injunction restraining the defendant from transferring, alienating, mortgaging, or otherwise dealing with agricultural land in Ahmedabad. The court found a strong prima facie case based on a registered sale agreement (Banakhat) dated 06-03-2021 for Rs. 56.63 lakhs with earnest money of Rs. 12 lakhs already paid, combined with the defendant's breach and the plaintiff's demonstrated readiness to perform. The court held that allowing alienation would render the specific performance suit infructuous and cause irreparable injury to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Order Granted: Temporary (interim) injunction allowed till final disposal of the suit. The Additional Senior Civil Judge, Sanand Court, granted the plaintiff's application for interim injunction restraining the defendant from transferring, alienating, mortgaging, or otherwise dealing with agricultural land in Ahmedabad. The court found a strong prima facie case based on a registered sale agreement (Banakhat) dated 06-03-2021 for Rs. 56.63 lakhs with earnest money of Rs. 12 lakhs already paid, combined with the defendant's breach and the plaintiff's demonstrated readiness to perform. The court held that allowing alienation would render the specific performance suit infructuous and cause irreparable injury to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts