Government of Gujarat vs BADRUBHAI @ BERO ALLARAKHA SINDHI Advocate - I U DESAI — 607/2023

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-B)A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH080008522023

Filing Number

607/2023

Filing Date

10-Aug-2023

Registration No

607/2023

Registration Date

10-Aug-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANDHUKA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192018230331

Police Station

DHANDHUKA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1-B)A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BADRUBHAI @ BERO ALLARAKHA SINDHI Advocate - I U DESAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Arms Act Section 25(1-B) for illegal possession of a homemade firearm worth ₹3,000, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the testimony of police witnesses alone, without credible independent corroboration, was insufficient to establish the offense, as the quality of evidence rather than quantity determines adequacy under the Indian Evidence Act Section 134. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 06-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 17-Oct-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 20-Sep-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 21-Aug-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 16-Jul-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 31-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 03-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 24-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 18-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 05-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 04-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 24-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 18-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 09-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 02-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 26-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 23-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 12-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 20-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 14-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  32. 10-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 10-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 607/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Arms Act Section 25(1-B) for illegal possession of a homemade firearm worth ₹3,000, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the testimony of police witnesses alone, without credible independent corroboration, was insufficient to establish the offense, as the quality of evidence rather than quantity determines adequacy under the Indian Evidence Act Section 134. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case