DHEERUBHAI PRABHUDAS RANPURA vs DINESHBHAI GHANSHYAMBHAI RANGHADIYA — 548/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH080008172025

Filing Number

548/2025

Filing Date

09-Sep-2025

Registration No

548/2025

Registration Date

09-Sep-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANDHUKA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHEERUBHAI PRABHUDAS RANPURA

    Adv. S P CHUDASMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI GHANSHYAMBHAI RANGHADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court acquitted the accused, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges against them under Section 14 of the relevant act. The court ordered the accused to be discharged and directed all case proceedings to be closed with costs to be borne by the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 09-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 09-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 548/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges against them under Section 14 of the relevant act. The court ordered the accused to be discharged and directed all case proceedings to be closed with costs to be borne by the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case