Government of Gujarat vs Sabir urfe tin tin nurmahmandbhai bhohriya Advocate - W M MODAN — 540/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),116-B,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH080008062025
e-Filing Number
25-08-2025
Filing Number
540/2025
Filing Date
04-Sep-2025
Registration No
540/2025
Registration Date
04-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANDHUKA
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
395
Police Station
DHANDHUKA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sabir urfe tin tin nurmahmandbhai bhohriya Advocate - W M MODAN
-
2.Sakir urfe bhano aarifbhai meman
Adv. W M MODAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted both accused Sabirbhai and Sakir of charges under the Prohibition Act and IPC Sections 65(a)(a), 116(b), and 81, finding insufficient evidence. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to multiple investigative lapses, unreliable witness testimony from the panchs (independent witnesses), and lack of corroborating independent evidence regarding the foreign liquor seizure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 540/2025
Summary The court acquitted both accused Sabirbhai and Sakir of charges under the Prohibition Act and IPC Sections 65(a)(a), 116(b), and 81, finding insufficient evidence. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to multiple investigative lapses, unreliable witness testimony from the panchs (independent witnesses), and lack of corroborating independent evidence regarding the foreign liquor seizure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts