DEPUTY ENGINEER OF UTTAR GUJARAT VIJ CAMPANY LTD. DHANDHUKA SUBDIVISION vs MUSTAKBHAI ESMAILBHAI SULEMANBHAI GHOGHARI Advocate - EX PARTY — 94/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 10. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAH080007742025
Filing Number
94/2025
Filing Date
22-Aug-2025
Registration No
94/2025
Registration Date
22-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANDHUKA
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEPUTY ENGINEER OF UTTAR GUJARAT VIJ CAMPANY LTD. DHANDHUKA SUBDIVISION
Adv. N H VAISHNAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUSTAKBHAI ESMAILBHAI SULEMANBHAI GHOGHARI Advocate - EX PARTY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The suit between Deputy Engineer of Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. and Mustakbhai Esmailbhai Sulemanbhai Ghoghari was disposed of unconditionally following withdrawal applications submitted by both parties. The court ordered no cost to either party and directed issuance of a refund certificate to the plaintiff company as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 94/2025
The suit between Deputy Engineer of Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. and Mustakbhai Esmailbhai Sulemanbhai Ghoghari was disposed of unconditionally following withdrawal applications submitted by both parties. The court ordered no cost to either party and directed issuance of a refund certificate to the plaintiff company as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts