DEPUTY ENGINEER OF UTTAR GUJARAT VIJ CAMPANY LTD. DHANDHUKA SUBDIVISION vs MOHANBHAI RAIYABHAI MUNDHAVA Advocate - EX PARTY — 82/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 10. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 30th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAH080007622025
Filing Number
82/2025
Filing Date
22-Aug-2025
Registration No
82/2025
Registration Date
22-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANDHUKA
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEPUTY ENGINEER OF UTTAR GUJARAT VIJ CAMPANY LTD. DHANDHUKA SUBDIVISION
Adv. N H VAISHNAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOHANBHAI RAIYABHAI MUNDHAVA Advocate - EX PARTY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court rejected UGVCL's suit for Rs.13,380.12 against the defendant for unpaid electricity dues because the suit was filed after the statutory two-year limitation period prescribed under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Although the court found the defendant's debt proved through oral and documentary evidence, it held that the suit filed on 22.08.2025 (over two years after the permanent disconnection on 04.01.2023) was time-barred and therefore not maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 82/2025
The court rejected UGVCL's suit for Rs.13,380.12 against the defendant for unpaid electricity dues because the suit was filed after the statutory two-year limitation period prescribed under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Although the court found the defendant's debt proved through oral and documentary evidence, it held that the suit filed on 22.08.2025 (over two years after the permanent disconnection on 04.01.2023) was time-barred and therefore not maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts