SANJAYBHAI AMRITLAL SANGHVI P.O.A.H.OF GUNWATIBEN AMRITLAL SANGHVI @ GANWANTIBEN KALIDASBHAI VASANI vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED Advocate - J C PARMAR — 26/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAH080005582021
Filing Number
26/2021
Filing Date
19-Jul-2021
Registration No
26/2021
Registration Date
19-Jul-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANDHUKA
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Last updated 15-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAYBHAI AMRITLAL SANGHVI P.O.A.H.OF GUNWATIBEN AMRITLAL SANGHVI @ GANWANTIBEN KALIDASBHAI VASANI
Adv. S K SANGHANI
-
2.SANJAYBHAI AMRITLAL SANGHVI P.O.A.H. OF TARAMATIBEN KALIDASBHAI VASANI @ TARAMATIBEN AMICHAND GOPANI
Adv. S K SANGHANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED Advocate - J C PARMAR
-
2.GUJARAT HEAD OF BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED
Adv. J C PARMAR
-
3.CHAMUNDA PETROLEUM
Adv. P M JINIYA
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Jan-2026
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Dec-2025
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Nov-2025
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Oct-2025
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Sep-2025
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Jul-2025
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Jun-2025
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-May-2025
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Apr-2025
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Mar-2025
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Jan-2025
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Dec-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Nov-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Oct-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Sep-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jul-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Jun-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Apr-2024
OrderView PDF
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 26/2021, the court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction and declaration of rights over an agricultural property in Dhandhuka, Ahmedabad. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, noting critical issues including: prior rejection of a similar 1987 suit for lack of statutory notice, evidence that the plaintiffs had sold portions of the property to third parties, and lack of clarity regarding current possession and title. The court held that such complex factual and legal questions—including res judicata concerns and necessary party joinder—cannot be resolved at the interlocutory stage without full evidence and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Apr-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Apr-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Mar-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Jan-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Dec-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Nov-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Oct-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Sep-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Aug-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Aug-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Jun-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-May-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
15-Apr-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Apr-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Mar-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-Feb-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
13-Jan-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
20-Dec-2022
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
18-Nov-2022
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Oct-2022
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Sep-2022
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
20-Aug-2022
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Jul-2022
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
18-Jun-2022
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
30-Apr-2022
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Mar-2022
For Counter Affidavit
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
21-Feb-2022
For Counter Affidavit
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Jan-2022
For Counter Affidavit
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
07-Dec-2021
For Counter Affidavit
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
23-Nov-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
26-Oct-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
30-Sep-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
25-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jul-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2021
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 26/2021, the court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction and declaration of rights over an agricultural property in Dhandhuka, Ahmedabad. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, noting critical issues including: prior rejection of a similar 1987 suit for lack of statutory notice, evidence that the plaintiffs had sold portions of the property to third parties, and lack of clarity regarding current possession and title. The court held that such complex factual and legal questions—including res judicata concerns and necessary party joinder—cannot be resolved at the interlocutory stage without full evidence and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts