Government of Gujarat vs bhupatbhai kalubhai daloliya Advocate - A G VAHUKIYA — 341/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH080004352025

e-Filing Number

04-03-2025

Filing Number

341/2025

Filing Date

03-Jun-2025

Registration No

341/2025

Registration Date

03-Jun-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANDHUKA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

646

Police Station

DHANDHUKA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.bhupatbhai kalubhai daloliya Advocate - A G VAHUKIYA

  2. 2.prakashbhai ghanshyambhai vadhrodiya

    Adv. A G VAHUKIYA

  3. 3.arvindbhai mohanbhai kanjiya

    Adv. S I BUKHARI

  4. 4.mohasinkhan rafikbhai pathan

    Adv. W M MODAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 303(2) and 54 (theft of electrical wire valued at ₹48,000 from railway property with criminal intimidation) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant witnesses' testimonies were contradictory, the police record lacked credibility regarding the accused's alleged knowledge of the theft, and the stolen property's connection to the accused could not be established conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 04-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 12-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 17-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 03-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 03-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 341/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 303(2) and 54 (theft of electrical wire valued at ₹48,000 from railway property with criminal intimidation) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant witnesses' testimonies were contradictory, the police record lacked credibility regarding the accused's alleged knowledge of the theft, and the stolen property's connection to the accused could not be established conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case