Government of Gujarat vs AJAYABHAI LAXMANBHAI SOLANKI — 7/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH080000092026
e-Filing Number
10-12-2025
Filing Number
7/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
05-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANDHUKA
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
605
Police Station
DHANDHUKA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJAYABHAI LAXMANBHAI SOLANKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted the accused under Section 264 of the Indian Penal Code and downgraded the charge from Section 85(1) to Section 66(1), sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 200/- with 5 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. The court found that while the chargesheet allegations were serious, the essential elements required for conviction under Section 85(1) were not sufficiently established on evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2026
The court convicted the accused under Section 264 of the Indian Penal Code and downgraded the charge from Section 85(1) to Section 66(1), sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 200/- with 5 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. The court found that while the chargesheet allegations were serious, the essential elements required for conviction under Section 85(1) were not sufficiently established on evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts