THE STATE vs AASHOKBHAI KANAIYALAL RANA — 5204/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070059692025

Filing Number

5209/2025

Filing Date

13-Nov-2025

Registration No

5204/2025

Registration Date

13-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

761

Police Station

Dholka Town Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AASHOKBHAI KANAIYALAL RANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) for rash and negligent driving on a public road in Dholka. Considering the accused's background as an impoverished first-time offender with family dependents and demonstrated remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹500 fine instead of the minimum prescribed punishment, emphasizing rehabilitation and societal reintegration over strict punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 24-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5204/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) for rash and negligent driving on a public road in Dholka. Considering the accused's background as an impoverished first-time offender with family dependents and demonstrated remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹500 fine instead of the minimum prescribed punishment, emphasizing rehabilitation and societal reintegration over strict punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case