THE STATE vs SABIRHUSEN ABDULRAHIM GHACHI — 5200/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070059652025

Filing Number

5205/2025

Filing Date

13-Nov-2025

Registration No

5200/2025

Registration Date

13-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

774

Police Station

Dholka Town Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SABIRHUSEN ABDULRAHIM GHACHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court ordered the closure of criminal proceedings against the accused under BNS Section 285, finding that the police had failed to produce the accused before the court despite multiple opportunities and that no further time should be given to police to secure the accused's presence. The decision was based on Supreme Court guidelines emphasizing the right to speedy trial and the court's authority to exercise powers under CrPC Sections 309, 311, and 258 to effectuate justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 24-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5200/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court ordered the closure of criminal proceedings against the accused under BNS Section 285, finding that the police had failed to produce the accused before the court despite multiple opportunities and that no further time should be given to police to secure the accused's presence. The decision was based on Supreme Court guidelines emphasizing the right to speedy trial and the court's authority to exercise powers under CrPC Sections 309, 311, and 258 to effectuate justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case