THE STATE vs NIRAJKUMAR PYARELAL PAL — 5099/2025
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH070057792025
Filing Number
5103/2025
Filing Date
09-Oct-2025
Registration No
5099/2025
Registration Date
09-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA
Judge
6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0625
Police Station
Dholka Town Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.NIRAJKUMAR PYARELAL PAL
-
2.KULDIPBHAI RAJKISHOR PAL
-
3.SHREE RAM MESH PAL
-
4.SHAILENDRA SANTRAAM PAL
-
5.AMRUTLAL CHANDRABHAN KORI
-
6.JITENDRAKUMAR DHANPAL SHAH
-
7.MANISHBHAI GIRDHARI SING
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Dholka court convicted seven accused persons under Section 12 of the Gambling Act for gambling with counterfeit currency notes, and sentenced each to a fine of ₹250 and three days imprisonment in default. The court considered the accused's age, circumstances, and guilty plea as mitigating factors while ordering confiscation of seized currency and destruction of gambling materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 5099/2025
The Dholka court convicted seven accused persons under Section 12 of the Gambling Act for gambling with counterfeit currency notes, and sentenced each to a fine of ₹250 and three days imprisonment in default. The court considered the accused's age, circumstances, and guilty plea as mitigating factors while ordering confiscation of seized currency and destruction of gambling materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts