THE STATE vs DIPAKBHAI RAMANBHAI RANA — 3408/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH070039172025
Filing Number
3408/2025
Filing Date
18-Jul-2025
Registration No
3408/2025
Registration Date
18-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA
Judge
6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192020250467
Police Station
Dholka Town Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIPAKBHAI RAMANBHAI RANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 for rash driving on a public road and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default), considering his impoverished background, first-time offense, and family circumstances as mitigating factors warranting lenient punishment. The judgment emphasized that lighter sentences with rehabilitation efforts would be more appropriate and just given the accused's socioeconomic status and potential for reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3408/2025
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 for rash driving on a public road and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default), considering his impoverished background, first-time offense, and family circumstances as mitigating factors warranting lenient punishment. The judgment emphasized that lighter sentences with rehabilitation efforts would be more appropriate and just given the accused's socioeconomic status and potential for reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts