THE STATE vs KISHANBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHUNARA — 3407/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH070039162025
Filing Number
3407/2025
Filing Date
18-Jul-2025
Registration No
3407/2025
Registration Date
18-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA
Judge
6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192020250450
Police Station
Dholka Town Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KISHANBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHUNARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court ordered the dismissal of criminal proceedings against the accused under BNS Section 285, finding that the police failed to produce the accused before the court despite repeated opportunities and that further time to the police would be unjustified. The court relied on Supreme Court guidelines establishing that criminal courts must exercise powers to effectuate the right to speedy trial when the accused's presence cannot be secured. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3407/2025
The court ordered the dismissal of criminal proceedings against the accused under BNS Section 285, finding that the police failed to produce the accused before the court despite repeated opportunities and that further time to the police would be unjustified. The court relied on Supreme Court guidelines establishing that criminal courts must exercise powers to effectuate the right to speedy trial when the accused's presence cannot be secured. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts