Government of Gujarat vs DWARAKADASBHAI NAROTTAMDASBHAI DHABALIYA — 1339/2015

Case under Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 Section 075,78. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070026942015

Case disposed

Filing Number

1339/2015

Filing Date

30-12-2015

Registration No

1339/2015

Registration Date

30-12-2015

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

FIR Details

FIR Number

347

Police Station

DHOLKA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

1994

Acts & Sections

Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 Section 075,78

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

DWARAKADASBHAI NAROTTAMDASBHAI DHABALIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

05-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

27-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

20-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary of C.C. NO. 1339/2015 The court ordered the criminal proceedings against the accused (Dwarakadasbhai Narottamdasbhai Dhabaliya) to be abated under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, due to the accused's prolonged absence and the police's failure to produce him despite warrant issuance. The court found that further extension of time to the police was unjustified, and given the extended pendency caused by non-appearance, closure of proceedings was warranted and legally appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.C. NO. 1339/2015 The court ordered the criminal proceedings against the accused (Dwarakadasbhai Narottamdasbhai Dhabaliya) to be abated under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, due to the accused's prolonged absence and the police's failure to produce him despite warrant issuance. The court found that further extension of time to the police was unjustified, and given the extended pendency caused by non-appearance, closure of proceedings was warranted and legally appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case