THE STATE vs KANUBHAI BHIKHABHAI — 1124/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070013112026

Filing Number

1124/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1124/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

549

Police Station

Dholka Rural Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KANUBHAI BHIKHABHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Kanubhai Bhikhabhai under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1) for driving a two-wheeler under the influence of alcohol on 01/05/2025. Considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances (poor family, sole breadwinner, first-time offender, and expressed commitment to reform), the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹2,100 fine instead of maximum imprisonment, with an alternate three-day jail term in case of non-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1124/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Kanubhai Bhikhabhai under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1) for driving a two-wheeler under the influence of alcohol on 01/05/2025. Considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances (poor family, sole breadwinner, first-time offender, and expressed commitment to reform), the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹2,100 fine instead of maximum imprisonment, with an alternate three-day jail term in case of non-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case