Government of Gujarat vs MAHEMUDBHAI LALBHAI BELIM Advocate - S J SAIYAD — 2343/2011
Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Section 011. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH070011702011
Filing Number
2343/2011
Filing Date
26-08-2011
Registration No
2343/2011
Registration Date
26-08-2011
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA
Judge
5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
118
Police Station
DHOLKA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2011
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MAHEMUDBHAI LALBHAI BELIM Advocate - S J SAIYAD
PARSOTTAMBHAI LAKHABHAI BHANGI
Adv. S.J.SAIYAD
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 16-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 09-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 2343/2011 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Mahemudbhai Lalbhai Belim and Parsottambhai Lakhabhai Bhangi) under Protection of Animals Act, Section 11(1)(d), finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including lack of independent witness corroboration, inconsistencies in police witness statements, and insufficient documentary evidence, concluding the accusation lacked merit despite formal procedural compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 2343/2011 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Mahemudbhai Lalbhai Belim and Parsottambhai Lakhabhai Bhangi) under Protection of Animals Act, Section 11(1)(d), finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including lack of independent witness corroboration, inconsistencies in police witness statements, and insufficient documentary evidence, concluding the accusation lacked merit despite formal procedural compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts