ASHABEN AJAYBHAI RANA vs AJAYBHAI RANCHHODBHAI RANA Advocate - Z T PATHAN — 93/2024
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,20,22. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJAH070007102024
Filing Number
93/2024
Filing Date
21-Feb-2024
Registration No
93/2024
Registration Date
21-Feb-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA
Judge
2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHABEN AJAYBHAI RANA
Adv. S J SAIYAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJAYBHAI RANCHHODBHAI RANA Advocate - Z T PATHAN
-
2.HANSABEN RANCHODBHAI RANA
Adv. Z T PATHAN
-
3.JYOTIBEN RAJESHBHAI RANA
Adv. Z T PATHAN
-
4.PRIYABEN VASANTBHAI RANA
Adv. Z T PATHAN
-
5.VAIBHAVI RAVINDRABHAI PARIKH
Adv. Z T PATHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary of Case 93/2024 Petitioner: Ashaben Ajaybhai Rana Respondents: Ajaybhai Ranchhodbhai Rana (husband) and family members The court partially granted the petitioner's application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner alleged domestic violence and abandonment by her husband. The court found domestic violence established under the Act's definition and awarded interim relief including: a monthly maintenance of Rs. 9,000 for the petitioner and Rs. 50,000 as damages. The court rejected certain claims lacking documentary evidence while recognizing the marital domestic violence and the petitioner's need for protection and financial support from her estranged husband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Order/Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Opponent
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Opponent
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Opponent
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Opponent
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
17-May-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
19-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
24-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
24-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
22-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
17-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
26-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
12-Jun-2024
Reply
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
14-May-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Apr-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 93/2024
Summary of Case 93/2024 Petitioner: Ashaben Ajaybhai Rana Respondents: Ajaybhai Ranchhodbhai Rana (husband) and family members The court partially granted the petitioner's application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner alleged domestic violence and abandonment by her husband. The court found domestic violence established under the Act's definition and awarded interim relief including: a monthly maintenance of Rs. 9,000 for the petitioner and Rs. 50,000 as damages. The court rejected certain claims lacking documentary evidence while recognizing the marital domestic violence and the petitioner's need for protection and financial support from her estranged husband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts