RAJUBHAI GOPALBHAI TALPADA vs THE STATE — 65/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJAH070003922026

Filing Number

65/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

65/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJUBHAI GOPALBHAI TALPADA

    Adv. M M SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted the petitioner's application to release a seized iPhone-13 mobile phone and a blue-colored phone on bond, finding that the petitioner established ownership of the devices and that no other claimant existed. The court imposed conditions requiring the petitioner to preserve the phones, not tamper with them, and produce them before the court when required, while ordering the police station to maintain custody of the bond and property documents, in accordance with the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1949. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 65/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petitioner's application to release a seized iPhone-13 mobile phone and a blue-colored phone on bond, finding that the petitioner established ownership of the devices and that no other claimant existed. The court imposed conditions requiring the petitioner to preserve the phones, not tamper with them, and produce them before the court when required, while ordering the police station to maintain custody of the bond and property documents, in accordance with the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1949. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case