THE STATE vs REKHABEN NARESHBHAI CHUNARA — 145/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001852026

Filing Number

145/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

145/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

455

Police Station

Dholka Rural Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REKHABEN NARESHBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused of an offense under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100, with a simple imprisonment of 5 days as an alternative in case of non-payment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offense, and family circumstances as mitigating factors while imposing the minimum penalty prescribed by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 145/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused of an offense under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100, with a simple imprisonment of 5 days as an alternative in case of non-payment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offense, and family circumstances as mitigating factors while imposing the minimum penalty prescribed by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case