THE STATE vs KIRANBHAI BHARATBHAI THAKOR — 138/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001782026

Filing Number

138/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

138/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

544

Police Station

Dholka Rural Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KIRANBHAI BHARATBHAI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act and Section 66(1) of the Prohibition Act for a motor vehicle offense committed on 03/01/2025. Considering the accused's socioeconomic background as a poor man with family dependents and this being a first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹2,100 (rupees two thousand one hundred) fine instead of the maximum prescribed punishment, with an additional simple imprisonment of 3 days in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 138/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act and Section 66(1) of the Prohibition Act for a motor vehicle offense committed on 03/01/2025. Considering the accused's socioeconomic background as a poor man with family dependents and this being a first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹2,100 (rupees two thousand one hundred) fine instead of the maximum prescribed punishment, with an additional simple imprisonment of 3 days in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case