THE STATE vs AAKASHBHAI MAFATBHAI PARMAR — 131/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(A),125(B). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001712026

Case disposed

Filing Number

131/2026

Filing Date

19-01-2026

Registration No

131/2026

Registration Date

19-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

12th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192064250470

Police Station

Dholka Rural Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281,125(A),125(B)
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

AAKASHBHAI MAFATBHAI PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

12-05-2026

Disposed

11-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

30-04-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

06-04-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

11-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

12-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Akashbhai Maftbhai Parmar, of charges under IPC Sections 281, 337(a), 337(b), and MV Act Sections 177, 184, finding the prosecution failed to establish rash or negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant's sole eyewitness testimony lacked credibility—he could not identify the vehicle, driver, or provide specifics about the accident—and later reconciled with the accused, weakening the case substantially. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Akashbhai Maftbhai Parmar, of charges under IPC Sections 281, 337(a), 337(b), and MV Act Sections 177, 184, finding the prosecution failed to establish rash or negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant's sole eyewitness testimony lacked credibility—he could not identify the vehicle, driver, or provide specifics about the accident—and later reconciled with the accused, weakening the case substantially. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case