ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR vs AXAR TREDERS — 111/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001492026

Filing Number

111/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

111/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AXAR TREDERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Dholka Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted Akshar Traders under Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act Section 7, finding a violation during a municipal inspection in Dholka. The court imposed a fine of ₹5,000 (with 3 days simple imprisonment as alternative), considering the accused's poor economic status, first-time offense, and commitment to reform as grounds for lenient sentencing below the statutory maximum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 111/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Dholka Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted Akshar Traders under Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act Section 7, finding a violation during a municipal inspection in Dholka. The court imposed a fine of ₹5,000 (with 3 days simple imprisonment as alternative), considering the accused's poor economic status, first-time offense, and commitment to reform as grounds for lenient sentencing below the statutory maximum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case