ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR vs PRAMUKH TAYAR SERVICE — 109/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001472026

Filing Number

109/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

109/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

1.ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.PRAMUKH TAYAR SERVICE

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Summary: The Dholka City Magistrate Court convicted the accused Ashok S. Chahal under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act, Section 7, for violations in the Dholka municipal area. Considering the accused's circumstances—being from a poor background, sole earning member of his family, having dependents, and this being his first offense—the court imposed a reduced sentence of ₹5,000 fine with a default imprisonment of 3 days, exercising judicial discretion to impose minimum punishment while ensuring justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
11-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
06-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
16-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 109/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Dholka City Magistrate Court convicted the accused Ashok S. Chahal under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act, Section 7, for violations in the Dholka municipal area. Considering the accused's circumstances—being from a poor background, sole earning member of his family, having dependents, and this being his first offense—the court imposed a reduced sentence of ₹5,000 fine with a default imprisonment of 3 days, exercising judicial discretion to impose minimum punishment while ensuring justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.