ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR vs PRAGATI ELECTRIC — 108/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001462026

Filing Number

108/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

108/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAGATI ELECTRIC

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act, Section 7, and sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (with 3 days simple imprisonment as default punishment). The judgment considered the accused's socioeconomic background, family status, first-time offense, and promise of reformation, imposing the minimum punishment permitted by law in accordance with judicial precedent requiring leniency in deserving cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 108/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act, Section 7, and sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (with 3 days simple imprisonment as default punishment). The judgment considered the accused's socioeconomic background, family status, first-time offense, and promise of reformation, imposing the minimum punishment permitted by law in accordance with judicial precedent requiring leniency in deserving cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case