ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR vs MURLIDHAR SHOW ROOM — 100/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001382026

Filing Number

100/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

100/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MURLIDHAR SHOW ROOM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused Ashok S. Chahal under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act, Section 7, for violations during an inspection in Dholka municipality. Considering mitigating factors including the accused's poor economic status, sole earning family member status, first-time offense, and commitment to avoid future crimes, the court imposed a reduced sentence of ₹5,000 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than the maximum penalty, balancing justice with rehabilitation and societal reintegration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Ashok S. Chahal under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act, Section 7, for violations during an inspection in Dholka municipality. Considering mitigating factors including the accused's poor economic status, sole earning family member status, first-time offense, and commitment to avoid future crimes, the court imposed a reduced sentence of ₹5,000 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than the maximum penalty, balancing justice with rehabilitation and societal reintegration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case